Modernization of Audit Process: Utilization of Technology on Evaluation of Audit Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53787/iconev.v4i1.34Keywords:
New Technologies, Audit Evidence Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Big Data BlockchainAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of new technologies on audit evidence evaluation and the modernization of audit standards. With advancements in technology, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI), big data, and blockchain, the audit process has undergone significant changes in how evidence is collected, analyzed, and evaluated. These technologies enhance efficiency, accuracy, and transparency in audits, but also pose challenges in terms of auditor adaptation and the updating of audit standards. This literature review identifies that the use of AI and big data allows auditors to handle large volumes of data more quickly, while blockchain offers solutions to improve the security and integrity of audit evidence. Although the benefits are substantial, the implementation of new technologies requires regulatory updates, the development of auditors' technical skills, and adjustments to existing infrastructure. This study suggests the need for collaboration between auditors, regulators, and technology developers to ensure the appropriate and effective use of technology in auditing. The findings are expected to provide guidance for audit professionals and regulatory authorities in navigating the rapid changes in the auditing landscape.
References
Agoglia, C. P., & Dilla, W. N. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on auditing. Journal of Information Systems, 34 (1), 1-22.
Albrecht, W.S., et al. (2021). Audit innovations: Emerging tools and technologies . Wiley.
Alles, M., & Gray, G.L. (2016). Incorporating big data in audits: Identifying inhibitors and a research agenda to address those inhibitors. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 22 , 44–59.
Appelbaum, D., Budnik, S., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2020). Auditing and accounting during and after the COVID-19 crisis. The CPA Journal, 90 (6), 14–19.
Backof, A.G., Bamber, E.M., & Carpenter, T.D. (2018). Cognitive factors in auditing: The effect of construal level on auditor evidence evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (4), 1013-1041.
Barr-Pulliam, D., Brown-Liburd, H.L., & Sanderson, K.-A. (2022). Technological advancements and audit quality: The role of auditor skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41 (1), 45-66.
Barr-Pulliam, D., Calvin, C.G., Eulerich, M., & Maghakyan, A. (2024). Audit evidence, technology, and judgment: A review of the literature in response to ED-500. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 35 (1), 36–67.
Bennett, G. B., & Hatfield, R. C. (2013). The effect of social interaction on audit judgment. Accounting Review, 88 (5), 2071-2097.
Bennett, G. B., & Hatfield, R. C. (2013). The effect of the social mismatch between staff auditors and client management on the collection of audit evidence. The Accounting Review, 88 (1), 31–50.
Chang, C. J., & Luo, Y. (2021). Data visualization and cognitive biases in audits. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36 (1), 1–16.
Cooper, L.A., Holderness, Jr., D.K., Sorensen, T.L., & Wood, D.A. (2019). Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33 (4), 15–35.
Cummings, L., et al. (2021). The role of blockchain in auditing: A new era. Accounting and Finance Review, 45 (3), 10-26.
Dyball, M. C., & Seethamraju, R. (2022). Client use of blockchain technology: Exploring its (potential) impact on financial statement audits of Australian accounting firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35 (7), 1656–1684.
Ekawahyu Kasih, Ngadi Permana, Farah Qalbia, & Muhamad Chaidir. (2023). Exploring the intersection of AI and business ethics: A qualitative study on digital marketing development in Indonesia. Proceedings of The International Conference on Business and Economics, 1 (2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.56444/icbeuntagsmg.v1i2.1457
Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The impact of audit technology on audit task outcomes: Evidence for technology-based audit techniques. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40 , 981–1012.
Feng, Z., et al. (2020). Regulatory challenges in the modern audit environment. Journal of International Accounting and Taxation, 26 (2), 58-72.
Grenier, J. H. (2017). Encouraging professional skepticism in the industry specialization era. Journal of Business Ethics, 142 (2), 241–256.
Hammersley, J. S., & Ricci, M. A. (2021). Using audit programs to improve auditor evidence collection. The Accounting Review, 96 (1), 251–272.
Hirst, D. E. (1994). Auditors' sensitivity to source reliability. Journal of Accounting Research, 32 (1), 113-126.
IFAC (International Federation of Accountants). (2022). Adapting to technology in auditing . IFAC.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2021). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 500: Audit Evidence .
Kasih, EW, & Estiana, D. (2022). Analysis of factors influencing audit timeliness in banking sector companies listed on the IDX (2012-2014). Studia Ekonomika, 15 (1), 17–32. https:/ /doi.org/10.70142/studiaekonomika.v15i1.83
Moffitt, K.C., & Vasarhelyi, M.A. (2020). Robotic process automation in audit: A case study of a major accounting firm. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39 (3), 125-146.
Rasso, J. T. (2015). Construal instructions and professional skepticism in evaluating complex estimates. Accounting Horizons, 29 (3), 713-730.
Rizal, M., & Aini, N. (2022). The effect of company size, going concern audit opinion and audit lag on auditor switching (Empirical study on financial sector service companies, investment sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017). Studia Ekonomika, 20 (1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.70142/studiaekonomika.v20i1.100
Shelton, S. W. (1999). The effect of experience on the use of irrelevant evidence in auditor judgment. Accounting Review, 74 (2), 217-224.
Sullivan, D., & Hossain, M. (2020). Overcoming barriers to technology adoption in auditing. International Journal of Auditing Technology, 3 (1), 7-22.
Williams, P., & Gutierrez, C. (2021). The role of big data in the evolution of audit evidence. Accounting Horizons, 35 (2), 23-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License. This license allows authors to copy and redistribute the material in any or medium format. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.